What research method did Tajfel use?

Strength – Tajfel used the laboratory experiment method of research which had the advantage of enabling him to control the environment in terms of what the participants experienced including the information and instructions given to them and ensure that no other factors could influence their behaviour.

What were the findings of Tajfel & Turner’s Kandinsky and Klee study?

What were the findings of Tajfel & Turner’s “Kandinsky vs Klee” study? The boys’ level of self-esteem increased as a result of being in their in-group. The boys began to show more competition when they believed that they were competing with an out-group, rather than against members of their in-group.

What are the strengths of the social identity theory?

Here are some of the strengths and limitations of the theory: SIT describes the cognitive processes (categorization, identification, and social comparison) that explain group loyalty and out-group hostility.

What is positive distinctiveness?

Positive distinctiveness is a component of Social Identity Theory and is when a social group is made to appear more positive and valued by using verbal and non-verbal cues. Individuals seek to build and maintain positive distinctiveness for their group.

Who founded the social identity theory?

Henri Tajfel
In 1979 British psychologists Henri Tajfel and John Turner introduced the Social Identity Theory, where our ‘social identity’ within a group shapes our norms, attitudes and behaviour.

What is the limitation of Social Identity Theory?

A weaknesses of the Social identity theory is that its application is restricted in the sense that it has very low ecological validity. Another weakness is that SIT favors situational factors rather than dispositional is not supported by evidence.

What is wrong with the Social Identity Theory?

Then five issues which have proved problematic for Social Identity Theory are identified the relationship between group identification and ingroup bias; the self-esteem hypothesis; positive-negative asymmetry in intergroup discrimination; the effects of intergroup similarity; and the choice of identity strategies by …

How does the Social Identity Theory explain discrimination?

For Social Identity Theory (SIT), identification with the ingroup category is a necessary condition for discrimination. In contrast, the Behavioral Interaction Model (BIM) proposes that self-interest and interdependence are at the root of discrimination.

What was the criticism of Tajfel’s study?

Another criticism is that Tajfel has reduced the complex human behaviour of discrimination to a very simple level, focusing just on minimal groups and performance of a simple experimental task. This study deals with a destructive and anti-social, but very common feature of society in examining the causes of prejudice and discrimination.

Why was the Tajfel experiment called a minimal group?

These experiments were known as “Minimal Groups” studies, because Tajfel was looking at groups that people had the minimal possible reason to feel loyal to. Tajfel recruited Bristol schoolboys aged 14-15 and divided them into minimal groups.

What was the purpose of Tajfel et al 1971 flashcards?

To test whether the simple act of grouping was enough to produce prejudice between groups of very similar people even when there is no history or competition between the groups. An opportunity sample of 64 14-15 year old boys from a Bristol comprehensive school was used, who supposedly already had a cohesive (one) group identity. Nice work!

How did Tajfel contribute to the development of social identity theory?

Evaluate: results contributed to the development of the social identity theory. Tajfel demonstrated that a minimal group is all that is necessary for individuals to exhibit discrimination against outgroups. This experiment was criticised for being too artificial, and having demand characteristics.

What research method did Tajfel use? Strength – Tajfel used the laboratory experiment method of research which had the advantage of enabling him to control the environment in terms of what the participants experienced including the information and instructions given to them and ensure that no other factors could influence their behaviour. What were the…